Legal Opinion

Mollette v. Portsmouth City Council

Ohio Court of Appeals

Decided November 19, 2008No. 07CA3206PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Harsha, Judge.

{¶ 1} Teresa and Robert Mollette brought this action alleging that the Portsmouth City Council violated the city charter and the Open Meetings Act (R.C. 121.22) when it adopted an ordinance that authorized the mayor to enter into negotiations to purchase a building. The Mollettes alleged that city council reached its decision after deliberating in private sessions in violation of the charter and the statute. In granting summary judgment in favor of the Mollettes, the trial court invalidated the ordinance and enjoined the city council from deliberating in any executive sessions,…

Also in this document: Concurrence.

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. Mitseff v. WheelerOhio Supreme Court · 1988
  2. Doe v. ShafferOhio Supreme Court · 2000
  3. Peterson v. TeodosioOhio Supreme Court · 1973
  4. Bostic v. ConnorOhio Supreme Court · 1988
  5. Kulch v. Structural Fibers, Inc.Ohio Supreme Court · 1997

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Wray v. Gahm Properties, Ltd.Ohio Court of Appeals · 2018
  2. Curren v. GreenfieldOhio Court of Appeals · 2012
  3. Estate of Fleenor v. Ottawa Cty.Ohio Court of Appeals · 2024
  4. McConnell v. DudleyOhio Court of Appeals · 2018
  5. Campbell v. SchlegelOhio Court of Appeals · 2015

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API