Wray v. Gahm Properties, Ltd.
Ohio Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the CourtHarsha, J.
{¶ 1} The Director, Ohio Department of Transportation (ODOT) appeals the trial court's entry awarding costs and expenses to Gahm Properties, Ltd., in an appropriation action. ODOT notes that a property owner is not entitled to recover costs and expenses unless the property was used for agricultural purposes, and contends there was no evidence of such use here. Gahm Properties argues it presented evidence that it harvested timber, which is an agricultural use of the property, so the trial court properly awarded it costs and expenses.
{¶ 2} We find that the plain language of the statute is…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Eastley v. VolkmanOhio Supreme Court · 2012
- Cleveland Clinic Found. v. Cleveland Bd. of Zoning Appeals (Slip Opinion)Ohio Supreme Court · 2014
- State v. AndersonOhio Supreme Court · 2014
- Wilson v. Lawrence (Slip Opinion)Ohio Supreme Court · 2017
- Lang v. Dir., Ohio Department of Job & Family ServicesOhio Supreme Court · 2012
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Turner v. Dimex, L.L.C.Ohio Court of Appeals · 2019
- Columbus Bituminous Concrete Corp. v. Harrison Twp. Bd. of Zoning Appeals (In re Columbus Bituminous Concrete Corp.), Court of Appeals of Ohio, Fourth District, Pickaway County2018
- Conner v. Conner, Court of Appeals of Ohio, Fourth District, Gallia County2018
- Cordell v. White, Court of Appeals of Ohio, Fourth District, Gallia County2018
- David Rentals, L.L.C. v. Virginia Woods, L.L.C.Ohio Court of Appeals · 2024
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.