Piedmont Equipment Co. v. Eberhard Manufacturing Co.
Nevada Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
By the Court,
Mowbray, J.:
Appellants Piedmont Equipment Company (Piedmont) and Lumberman’s Mutual Casualty Company (Lumberman’s) seek indemnification from respondent Eberhard Manufacturing Company (Eberhard) for litigation expenses incurred in defending a products liability action. At the jury trial on the products liability claims Eberhard was held liable to the plaintiff, but Piedmont was exonerated of liability.
Piedmont had, in the principal suit, cross-claimed against Eberhard seeking indemnification. The court below denied Piedmont’s indemnification claim. We reverse the judgment…
2Cases cited19 opinions
- Shaffer v. Honeywell, Inc.South Dakota Supreme Court · 1976
- Farr v. Armstrong Rubber CompanySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1970
- Krug v. Sterling Drug, Inc.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1967
- Inhabitants of Westfield v. MayoMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1877
- Davis v. Air Technical Industries, Inc.California Supreme Court · 1978
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by35 opinions
- Fisk Electric Co. v. Constructors & Associates, Inc.Texas Supreme Court · 1994
- United Nat'l Ins. Co. v. Frontier Ins. Co.Nevada Supreme Court · 2004
- The Doctors Co. v. VincentNevada Supreme Court · 2004
- Ina Insurance Co. of North America v. Valley Forge InsuranceCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1986
- United National Insurance v. Frontier InsuranceNevada Supreme Court · 2004
30 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.