Legal Opinion

Fisk Electric Co. v. Constructors & Associates, Inc.

Texas Supreme Court

Decided December 1, 1994No. D-4527PublishedCited by 103 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Enoch

in which all Justices join.

This is an appeal to determine whether an indemnitor, Fisk Electric Company, must pay attorney’s fees and other expenses incurred by an indemnitee, Constructors & Associates, when the indemnitee is accused of negligence, but not found to be negligent, and the indemnity agreement does not meet the express negligence test. The trial court granted summary judgment in favor of Fisk, finding that the indemnify agreement did not satisfy the express negligence test announced in Ethyl Corp. v. Daniel Construction Co., 725 S.W.2d 705 (Tex.1987), and thus, concluding that…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. Ethyl Corp. v. Daniel Construction Co.Texas Supreme Court · 1987
  2. Pullman Standard, Inc. v. Abex Corp.Tennessee Supreme Court · 1985
  3. Atlantic Richfield Co. v. Petroleum Personnel, Inc.Texas Supreme Court · 1989
  4. Ina Insurance Co. of North America v. Valley Forge InsuranceCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1986
  5. Farmington Plumbing & Heating Co. v. Fischer Sand & Aggregate, Inc.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1979

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by103 opinions

  1. Tesoro Petroleum Corp. v. Nabors Drilling USA, Inc., Texas Court of Appeals, 1st District (Houston)2003
  2. Transcontinental Gas Pipeline Corp. v. Texaco, Inc., Texas Court of Appeals, 1st District (Houston)2001
  3. Starcrest Trust v. Berry, Texas Court of Appeals, 3rd District (Austin)1996
  4. Ramsay v. Texas Trading Co., Inc., Texas Court of Appeals, 6th District (Texarkana)2008
  5. Southwest Intelecom, Inc. v. Hotel Networks Corp., Texas Court of Appeals, 3rd District (Austin)1999

98 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API