State v. Thompson
Supreme Court of Connecticut
1Opinion of the CourtPeters, J.
These appeals concern the extent to which the state police are required to minimize electronic *362surveillance when conducting telephone wiretaps pursuant to General Statutes § 54-41a et seq. (wiretap statute), in the course of a narcotics investigation. In each case, the trial court dismissed informations charging the defendants Neil J. Thompson, Robert E. Parker, Jr., James C. Black, and Frank P. LePore with conspiracy to possess and distribute narcotics, after the defendants successfully moved, on the basis of inadequate minimization, to suppress evidence obtained from the wiretaps.1 From the…
2Cases cited42 opinions
- Bivens v. Six Unknown Named Agents of Federal Bureau of NarcoticsSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
- Katz v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
- Scott v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
- Marron v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1927
- Berger v. New YorkSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
37 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- State v. McVeighSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1993
- State v. RalstonConnecticut Appellate Court · 1986
- Myers v. StateCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 1984
- State v. CalashSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1989
- State v. FormicaConnecticut Appellate Court · 1985
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.