State v. McVeigh

The dispositive issue in these consolidated appeals is whether a communication over the radio wave portion of a cordless telephone is a “[w]ire communi*595cation” as defined in General Statutes § 54-41a (1),1 which is part of our judicially supervised wiretap act (wiretap act). General Statutes §§ 54-41a through 54-41t. The defendants, Mary McVeigh and William McVeigh, appeal2 from the judgments of conviction, following the denial of their motions to suppress and following their conditional pleas of nolo contendere pursuant to General Statutes § 54-94a,3 of possession of cocaine with intent to…