Legal Opinion

State v. Ralston

Connecticut Appellate Court

Decided June 17, 1986No. 3741PublishedCited by 20 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBorden, J.

The state appeals, with the permission of the trial court, from the judgment dismissing with prejudice the information against the defendant following the suppression of wiretap evidence. The issues involve: (1) the sufficiency of the affidavits accompanying the applications to support the findings of probable cause for the issuance of the wiretap orders; (2) whether probable cause was required as to this defendant, whose telephone was not the subject of the orders but who was one of the named targets of the taps; and (3) whether General Statutes § 54-41c (7) precludes from the probable cause…

2Cases cited23 opinions

  1. Aguilar v. TexasSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
  2. Spinelli v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
  3. Smith v. MarylandSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
  4. United States v. DonovanSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
  5. United States v. Arthur TortorelloCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1973

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by20 opinions

  1. State v. JohnsonSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1991
  2. State v. ParentConnecticut Appellate Court · 1986
  3. State v. BrownConnecticut Appellate Court · 1988
  4. State v. BantaConnecticut Appellate Court · 1988
  5. Hartford Federal Sayings & Loan Ass'n v. TuckerConnecticut Appellate Court · 1988

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API