Legal Opinion
State v. Calash
Supreme Court of Connecticut
Decided August 8, 1989No. 13607; 13608; 13609; 13610PublishedCited by 11 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtGlass, J.
The state filed informations against the defendants William Calash, William Girolomoni, Frank Rogers and Elliot Vallas, charging them with the crime *488of conspiracy to violate the state narcotic drug act. General Statutes §§ 21a-277 (a) and 53a-48 (a).1 The state also charged Rogers and Vallas with the crime of possession of a narcotic substance. General Statutes § 21a-279 (a).2 Prior to trial, the defendants moved to suppress evidence of tape recorded telephone conversations.3 The trial court granted Vallas’ motion in part, but denied all other motions.
*489Thereafter, the defendants entered pleas…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- United States v. GiordanoSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
- United States v. DonovanSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
- United States v. ChavezSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
- United States v. VentoCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1976
- Commonwealth v. VitelloMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1975
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- State v. JohnsonSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1991
- State v. McVeighSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1993
- State v. TothConnecticut Appellate Court · 1993
- State v. CastanoConnecticut Appellate Court · 1991
- State v. SailorConnecticut Appellate Court · 1994
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.