Legal Opinion

Edward Lee Brown v. United States

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided February 1, 1967No. 20349_1PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

HAMLIN, Circuit Judge.

Appellant was convicted by a jury in the United States District Court for the Northern District of California of two counts of selling and concealing heroin in violation of 21 U.S.C. § 174. He appeals.

The sufficiency of the evidence is not challenged; the record amply supports the jury finding.

The second paragraph of 21 U.S.C. § 174 provides:

“Whenever on trial for a violation of this section the defendant is shown to have or to have had possession of the narcotic drug, such possession shall be deemed sufficient evidence to authorize conviction unless the defendant…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Griffin v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1965
  2. United States v. GaineySupreme Court of the United States · 1965
  3. Bruno v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1939
  4. Tad R. Knowles v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1955
  5. Calvin Hayes, Jr. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1966

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. State v. BarryWashington Supreme Court · 2015
  2. United States v. Bobbie L. BishopCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1976
  3. Helen Reyes v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1969
  4. Lonzo Nutter v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1969
  5. McCracken v. StateAlaska Supreme Court · 1967

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API