Legal Opinion

Calvin Hayes, Jr. v. United States

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided November 16, 1966No. 20780_1PublishedCited by 25 opinions

1Per curiam

Appellant was convicted for violating the Dyer Act, 18 U.S.C. § 2312. His sole ground for appeal is that the prosecutor’s closing argument constituted comment on his failure to testify. 1 Jurisdiction of this court is based on 28 U.S.C. §§ 1291 and 1294.

The rule that a defendant’s refusal to testify may not be commented on is, of course, based on the Fifth Amend ment and its statutory analogue, 18 U.S.C. § 3481. Wilson v. United States, 149 U.S. 60, 13 S.Ct. 765, 37 L.Ed. 650; Griffin v. State of California, 380 U.S. 609, 85 S.Ct. 1229, 14 L.Ed.2d 106. “The test is whether the language used…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Griffin v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1965
  2. Wilson v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1893
  3. Tad R. Knowles v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1955
  4. John W. Davis, Hugh Winn, John Katsikos, and Joseph Leo Vedder v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1966
  5. United States of America Ex Rel. Salvatore D'ambrosio, Relator-Appellant v. Hon. Edward M. Fay, as Warden of Green Haven Prison, Stormville, New YorkCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1965

3Cited by25 opinions

  1. Ramos v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1967
  2. United States v. Edward A. Greer and Alphonse P. BartkusCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1972
  3. United States v. John Clifford ChaneyCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1971
  4. United States v. Charles Layton CoxCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1970
  5. Albert J. Vitali v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1967

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API