Calvin Hayes, Jr. v. United States
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
1Per curiam
Appellant was convicted for violating the Dyer Act, 18 U.S.C. § 2312. His sole ground for appeal is that the prosecutor’s closing argument constituted comment on his failure to testify. 1 Jurisdiction of this court is based on 28 U.S.C. §§ 1291 and 1294.
The rule that a defendant’s refusal to testify may not be commented on is, of course, based on the Fifth Amend ment and its statutory analogue, 18 U.S.C. § 3481. Wilson v. United States, 149 U.S. 60, 13 S.Ct. 765, 37 L.Ed. 650; Griffin v. State of California, 380 U.S. 609, 85 S.Ct. 1229, 14 L.Ed.2d 106. “The test is whether the language used…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Griffin v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1965
- Wilson v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1893
- Tad R. Knowles v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1955
- John W. Davis, Hugh Winn, John Katsikos, and Joseph Leo Vedder v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1966
- United States of America Ex Rel. Salvatore D'ambrosio, Relator-Appellant v. Hon. Edward M. Fay, as Warden of Green Haven Prison, Stormville, New YorkCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1965
3Cited by25 opinions
- Ramos v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1967
- United States v. Edward A. Greer and Alphonse P. BartkusCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1972
- United States v. John Clifford ChaneyCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1971
- United States v. Charles Layton CoxCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1970
- Albert J. Vitali v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1967
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.