McCracken v. State

OPINION

Before NESBETT, C. J., and DIMOND and RABINO WITZ, JJ. RABINOWITZ, Justice.

Appellant seeks reversal of two convictions of assault with a dangerous weapon. 1 Review of appellant’s three specifications of error has led us to the decision that the judgments and commitments entered by the superior court should be affirmed.

Appellant’s initial assertion of error concerns a question which the trial judge propounded during voir dire of the prospective jury panel. 2 The text of the disputed question is as follows: “Have any of you ever sat on a jury in which Mr. McCracken has been involved ?”…