State v. Barry
Washington Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtWiggins, J.
¶1 Robert Barry appeals his conviction on two counts of child molestation, claiming that the trial court’s instruction in response to a jury question violated his Fifth Amendment and Sixth Amendment rights under the United States Constitution. The jury asked the court whether it may consider “observations of the defendant’s actions-demeanor during the court case” as “evidence.” In response, the trial court instructed the jury that “[e]vidence includes what you witness in the courtroom.” All parties *301agree that the record contains no references whatsoever to Barry’s in-court demeanor, so we…
2Cases cited68 opinions
- Chapman v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
- Gideon v. WainwrightSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
- Gideon v. WainwrightSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
- Schmerber v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- Griffin v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1965
63 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by34 opinions
- State Of Washington v. Terrance Jon IrbyCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2018
- State Of Washington v. Justin Nicholas JenningsCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2020
- State of Washington v. Carlos Hernandez, IICourt of Appeals of Washington · 2018
- State Of Washington v. D. W. C.Court of Appeals of Washington · 2018
- State Of Washington v. Greycloud LawlerCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2016
29 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.