Legal Opinion
Center for Sierra Nevada Conservation v. County of El Dorado
California Court of Appeal
Decided January 20, 2012No. C064875PublishedCited by 14 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
*1161Opinion
HOCH, J.
This appeal arises from the County of El Dorado’s (County) adoption of an oak woodland management plan and mitigation fee program without an environmental impact report (EIR). The County issued a negative declaration for the plan and fee program, thereby dispensing with the requirement of an EIR under the California Environmental Quality Act (Pub. Resources Code, §§ 21000 et seq., 21050; CEQA).1 The negative declaration was premised on a program EIR that the County completed in 2004 at the same time as it formulated its general plan (2004 General Plan). The 2004 General Plan…
2Cases cited31 opinions
- Laurel Heights Improvement Ass'n of San Francisco, Inc. v. Regents of University of CaliforniaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1988
- Western States Petroleum Assn. v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1995
- Vineyard Area Citizens for Responsible Growth, Inc. v. City of Rancho CordovaCalifornia Supreme Court · 2007
- Citizens of Goleta Valley v. Board of SupervisorsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1990
- Laurel Heights Improvement Ass'n of San Francisco, Inc. v. Regents of University of CaliforniaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1993
26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by14 opinions
- City of Maywood v. Los Angeles Unified School DistrictCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2012
- Latinos Unidos De Napa v. City of NapaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2013
- California Clean Energy Committee v. City of WoodlandCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2014
- Saltonstall v. City of SacramentoCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2015
- Citizens Against Airport Pollution v. City of San JoseCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2014
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.