Legal Opinion
Saltonstall v. City of Sacramento
California Court of Appeal
Decided February 18, 2015No. C077772PublishedCited by 10 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
HOCH, J.
This appeal involves a challenge under the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) (Pub. Resources Code, § 21000 et seq.) to certification of an environmental impact report (EIR) and approval of a project to build a new entertainment and sports center (ESC) in downtown Sacramento. The project represents a partnership between the City of Sacramento (City) and Sacramento Basketball Holdings, LLC (Sacramento Basketball Holdings), to build a downtown arena at which the Sacramento Kings, a professional basketball team, will play. Planning, approval, and construction of the arena…
2Cases cited35 opinions
- Vermont Yankee Nuclear Power Corp. v. Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1978
- Laurel Heights Improvement Ass'n of San Francisco, Inc. v. Regents of University of CaliforniaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1988
- Friends of Mammoth v. Board of SupervisorsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1972
- No Oil, Inc. v. City of Los AngelesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1974
- Vineyard Area Citizens for Responsible Growth, Inc. v. City of Rancho CordovaCalifornia Supreme Court · 2007
30 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- Phillips v. CampbellCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2016
- Bridges v. Mt. San Jacinto Cmty. Coll. Dist., California Court of Appeal, 5th District2017
- Bridges v. Mt. San Jacinto Community College Dist.California Court of Appeal · 2017
- Bridges v. Mt. San Jacinto Community College Dist.California Court of Appeal · 2017
- Chico Advocates for a Responsible Economy v. City of ChicoCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2019
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.