Legal Opinion

Home Supply Co. v. Mader

Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Alleghany County

Decided January 21, 1953No. 3071Published

1Opinion of the Court

Nixon, J.,

On October 21,1950, defendant purchased from plaintiff a television set, with outdoor antenna and a 90-day service agreement. The purchase was financed by means of a bailment lease, under the terms of which defendant was to pay $170 as a down payment and $50 per month thereafter until the total amount of $760 had been paid. Defendant alleges that the set was expressly warranted to receive a “clear and intelligible picture.” After the down payment had been paid and the set installed, it failed to receive a picture as warranted. Plaintiff was given notice of this fact and promised to…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Demos Construction Co. v. Service Supply Corp.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1943
  2. Wensel v. ReedSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1947
  3. Sebastianelli v. Frank Et Ux.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1933
  4. Commonwealth to Use v. Breckenridge (Et Al.)Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1943

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API