Commonwealth to Use v. Breckenridge (Et Al.)
Superior Court of Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion by
Kenworthey, J.,
The action is on a replevin bond by a landlord against his tenant’s sureties. Judgment was entered for plaintiff after an order overruling an affidavit of defense raising questions of law and defendants’ failure to plead over. One of the sureties appeals.
The pleadings established the facts as follows: Plaintiff-landlord distrained for $2,835 rent. The tenant then brought an action of replevin pursuant to the Act of 1901, April 19, P. L. 88, as amended, 12 PS §1824 et seq. The bond on which appellant was surety was conditioned “that if ...... [tenant] ...... fail to…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Givens v. W. J. Gilmore Drug Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1939
- Mitchell v. Standard Repair Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1923
- Karns v. McKinneySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1874
- Baranofsky v. WeissSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1935
- McCrary v. McCullySuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1921
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Wensel v. ReedSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1947
- Home Supply Co. v. Mader, Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Alleghany County1953
- Kinney v. Russo, Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Lawrence County1977