Legal Opinion

Demos Construction Co. v. Service Supply Corp.

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided October 7, 1943No. Appeal, 18PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Hirt, J.,

Plaintiff by contract in writing, leased to the defendant a specified machine together with a quantity of pipe and fittings. Defendant is a dealer in new and used construction machinery and it was agreed that the equipment was leased for the use of Benjamin Foster Company in the building of a large dam at Enfield, Massachusetts. The function of the machine was to pump mixed concrete through the pipe and deliver it to the forms. After delivery on the work, the Foster Company made three unsuccessful attempts to operate the machine and then returned it to plaintiff in New…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Harrah v. Montour Railroad CompanySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1936
  2. Hill & MacMillan, Inc. v. TaylorSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1931
  3. Berardini v. KaySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1937
  4. Hobart Manufacturing Co. v. RodziewiczSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1936
  5. Madison-Kipp Corp. v. Price Battery Corp.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1933

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Cucchi v. Rollins Protective Services Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1988
  2. Eimco Corp. v. LombardiSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1960
  3. Holmes Packaging MacH. Corp. v. BinghamCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1967
  4. Pennsylvania Railroad v. J. Jacob Shannon & Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1949
  5. Schade v. Milk Control CommissionSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1961

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API