Legal Opinion

Sebastianelli v. Frank Et Ux.

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided March 7, 1933No. Appeal 41PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion bt

Keller, J.,

This appeal is from an order refusing to open a judgment confessed by virtue of a warrant ‘of attorney contained in a bailment lease.

The bailment lease covered a radio cabinet. It authorized a confession of judgment for the entire rental charge in case the bailee failed to pay the monthly installments called for in the agreement. The affidavit of default set up a failure to pay such installments after the first two, and judgment was entered for the balance of the rental under the agreement.

The subject matter of the contract was a “Victor Badio—Model R. E. 57.” The…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Dunmore v. PaddenSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1918
  2. Mathey v. Flory Milling Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1925
  3. Cherry Etc. v. Union Nat. Bk.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1925
  4. Plympton Cabinet Co. v. RosenbergSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1929

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Frantz Equip. Co. v. the Leo Butler Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1952
  2. Silverman v. Samuel Mallinger Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1953
  3. Holmes Packaging MacH. Corp. v. BinghamCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1967
  4. Home Supply Co. v. Mader, Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Alleghany County1953

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API