Legal Opinion

Wensel v. Reed

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided October 14, 1947No. Appeal, 71PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Arnold, J.,

Plaintiff filed affidavit of value and statutory bond in the sum of $1370.00 and issued a writ of replevin to obtain possession of an automobile held by the defendant. No declaration was then filed. The defendant promptly gave a counterbond and retained possession of the vehicle.

Stopping at this point, if the defendant intended to stand upon a lien he had no right to give a counterbond and keep possession, for his lien was fully protected by the plaintiff’s bond: McCrary v. McCully, 75 Pa. Superior Ct. 464; Pickering v. Yates, 51 Pa. Superior Ct. 436. Indeed in Cassidy v.…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Armstrong & Latta v. City of PhiladelphiaSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1915
  2. Drumgoole v. LyleSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1906
  3. McCrary v. McCullySuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1921
  4. Young v. CoucheSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1913
  5. Pickering v. YatesSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1912

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Aircraft Repair Services General Mediterranean Aviation Services v. Stambaugh's Air Service, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1999
  2. Wilson v. Highway Service MarinelandSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1980
  3. Mitchell v. McKinnisSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1981
  4. Frank v. Frithiof (In Re James)United States Bankruptcy Court, M.D. Pennsylvania · 2011
  5. Rufenacht v. La Carte Enterprises, Inc.District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · 1979

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API