Wensel v. Reed
Superior Court of Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion by
Arnold, J.,
Plaintiff filed affidavit of value and statutory bond in the sum of $1370.00 and issued a writ of replevin to obtain possession of an automobile held by the defendant. No declaration was then filed. The defendant promptly gave a counterbond and retained possession of the vehicle.
Stopping at this point, if the defendant intended to stand upon a lien he had no right to give a counterbond and keep possession, for his lien was fully protected by the plaintiff’s bond: McCrary v. McCully, 75 Pa. Superior Ct. 464; Pickering v. Yates, 51 Pa. Superior Ct. 436. Indeed in Cassidy v.…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Armstrong & Latta v. City of PhiladelphiaSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1915
- Drumgoole v. LyleSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1906
- McCrary v. McCullySuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1921
- Young v. CoucheSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1913
- Pickering v. YatesSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1912
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Aircraft Repair Services General Mediterranean Aviation Services v. Stambaugh's Air Service, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1999
- Wilson v. Highway Service MarinelandSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1980
- Mitchell v. McKinnisSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1981
- Frank v. Frithiof (In Re James)United States Bankruptcy Court, M.D. Pennsylvania · 2011
- Rufenacht v. La Carte Enterprises, Inc.District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · 1979
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.