Legal Opinion

Milner v. Ruthven

Supreme Court of Colorado

Decided February 17, 1947No. 15,520PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Hays

About the middle of August, 1942, Alfred L. Ruthven, an experienced subdivider of suburban tracts, was in the employ of A. Milner, a licensed real estate broker, under which employment he was: (1) To negotiate selling agency contracts between the owners of suburban tracts of land and Milner; (2) assist in preparing of such tracts for sale in small lots or parcels; (3) and sell same at prices to be agreed upon between the parties.

As compensation for the performance of said duties by plaintiff, Milner promised to prepare such tracts for sale, advance the necessary expenses therefor, contribute…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. McCarthy v. EddingsSupreme Court of Colorado · 1942
  2. Briggs v. RobinsonSupreme Court of Colorado · 1927
  3. Mountain States Oil Corp. v. SandovalSupreme Court of Colorado · 1942
  4. Zimmerman v. HinderliderSupreme Court of Colorado · 1944

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Allen v. First National BankSupreme Court of Colorado · 1949
  2. Weigel v. HardestyColorado Court of Appeals · 1976
  3. Nickel v. PolliaCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1950
  4. Dollison v. CookSupreme Court of Colorado · 1961
  5. Wilson v. Ross Investment CompanySupreme Court of Colorado · 1947

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API