Legal Opinion

McCarthy v. Eddings

Supreme Court of Colorado

Decided June 29, 1942No. 14,978PublishedCited by 18 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Bock

Marshall Eddings, to whom we hereinafter refer as plaintiff, obtained a judgment in the sum of $10,832.15 against Wilson McCarthy and Henry Swan, as trustees of The Denver and Rio Grande Western Railroad Company, hereinafter designated defendants. A reversal of the judgment is sought on this review. The errors assigned for reversal may be summarized as follows: (1) Failure to prove negligence; (2) failure to prove proximate cause; (3) release as a bar to recovery; (4) excessive damages.

1. At the conclusion of all the testimony defendants moved for a directed verdict because, among other…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Riss & Co. v. AndersonSupreme Court of Colorado · 1941
  2. Williams v. Sleepy Hollow Mining Co.Supreme Court of Colorado · 1906
  3. Arps v. City & County of DenverSupreme Court of Colorado · 1927
  4. City of Longmont v. SwearingenSupreme Court of Colorado · 1927
  5. Dusing v. NelsonSupreme Court of Colorado · 1883

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by18 opinions

  1. Barker v. Colorado Reg.-Sports Car Club of Am., Inc.Colorado Court of Appeals · 1974
  2. Gleason v. GuzmanSupreme Court of Colorado · 1981
  3. Maloney v. JusselSupreme Court of Colorado · 1952
  4. Davis v. Flatiron Materials CompanySupreme Court of Colorado · 1973
  5. Joyce Darrold Locke v. The Atchison, Topeka and Santa Fe Railway Company, a CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1962

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API