Legal Opinion

Nickel v. Pollia

Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit

Decided January 3, 1950No. 3895PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

HUXMAN, Circuit Judge.

Andrew A. Pollia and six use plaintiffs brought this action in the United States District Court for the District of Wyoming, against E. C. Nickel, the base contractor, herein referred to as the contractor, and the Federal Public Housing Authority, herein referred to as F.P.H.A., formerly the United States Housing Authority, to recover for work done and materials furnished under a subcontract with the contractor. The rights of the six use plaintiffs and an intervener are all dependent upon Pollia and further reference to them is not necessary. The amended complaint…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Dermott v. JonesSupreme Court of the United States · 1860
  2. International Correspondence School, Inc. v. CrabtreeTennessee Supreme Court · 1931
  3. United States v. DriscollSupreme Court of the United States · 1878
  4. Turner v. EaganCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1911
  5. Briggs v. RobinsonSupreme Court of Colorado · 1927

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. The United States v. Johnson Controls, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1983
  2. Health Application Systems v. Hartford LifeDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1980
  3. Kennedy Electric Co., Inc. v. United States Postal ServiceDistrict Court, D. Colorado · 1973
  4. Eastern Trans-Waste of Maryland, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 1992
  5. Gardiner Manufacturing Co. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1973

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API