Legal Opinion

Zimmerman v. Hinderlider

Supreme Court of Colorado

Decided April 24, 1944No. 15,115PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Burke

These parties appear here in the same order as in the trial court and are hereinafter referred to as there, or by name.

Plaintiff, claiming' ownership of a decreed reservoir right, brought this action in 1935 alleging that defendants, ten years before, entered into a conspiracy to destroy that right, which conspiracy they had effectuated each day since, and prayed damages in the sum of $14,000. Defendants denied generally. The cause was tried to the court and they had judgment. To review that judgment plaintiff prosecutes this writ. The thirteen assignments, so far as they require cognizance,…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Zimmerman v. HinderliderSupreme Court of Colorado · 1939
  2. Zimmerman v. HinderliderSupreme Court of Colorado · 1938

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Johnson v. BensonColorado Court of Appeals · 1986
  2. T.A. Pelsue Co. v. Grand Enterprises, Inc.District Court, D. Colorado · 1991
  3. Milner v. RuthvenSupreme Court of Colorado · 1947

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API