Legal Opinion

McAleer v. Waddell-O'brien Motor Co.

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided September 23, 1924No. 13553PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

RUTH, C.

Plaintiff in error filed this action in the district court of Oklahoma county against the Waddell-O’Brien Motor Company, praying judgment on certain promissory notes, and at the same time attached certain property as the property of the defendant, and the property so attached included one Grant touring car. One R. C. Cope intervened in the cause, claiming ownership of the car, and filed his petition of intervention, which appears in the record as follows (omitting formal parts) :

“R. C. Cope, being first duly sworn upon oath, states: The property hereinafter described has…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Hunter v. HughesSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1920
  2. Haddock v. JohnsonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1920
  3. Cates v. MilesSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1917
  4. Crawford v. ShintafferSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1923
  5. Chestnut v. OverholserSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1919

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co. v. HamSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1927
  2. Burton v. GravesSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1929
  3. First Nat. Bank v. Lowe & Campbell Athletic Goods Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1936

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API