Chestnut v. Overholser
Supreme Court of Oklahoma
Error from District Court, Oklahoma County; John W. Hayson, Judge. Action between M. J. Chestnut and others and Ed Overholser. From the judgment the-parties first named bring error.
1Opinion of the CourtKane, J.
This case came on to he heard upon motion to dismiss, filed by defendant in error, upon the grounds: first, that the case-made is void because it was settled and signed by the trial judge in the absence of the’ defendant in error or his attorneys and without his consent prior to the expiration of the time granted defendant in error to suggest amendments thereto; second, that the proceedings to review the action of the trial court were not instituted in the Supreme Gourt within the time provided by law; and third, that the case-made was not served, upon defendant in error within the time…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Powell v. NicholsSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1910
- M. K. & T. Railway Co. v. City of Fort ScottSupreme Court of Kansas · 1875
- Cummings v. TateSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1915
- Healy v. DavisSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1912
- Manes v. HossSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1911
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- Landers v. Bank of Commerce of OkmulgeeSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1924
- Crawford v. ShintafferSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1923
- McDonell v. Continental Supply Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1920
- Bradfield v. BlackSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1930
- Brockhaus v. Aetna Bldg. & Loan Ass'nSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1920
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.