Legal Opinion
Haddock v. Johnson
Supreme Court of Oklahoma
Decided December 14, 1920No. 9586PublishedCited by 20 opinions
Error from District Court, Carter County; W. E. Freeman, Judge. Action by Jimmie Johnson and others against E. T. Haddock and K. H. Chowning to cancel conveyance of full-blood Indian heirs. Judgment for plaintiffs, and defendants bring error.
1Opinion of the CourtMcNBILL, J.
This is an appeal from the district court of Carter county, and it is agreed that the same involves only one question, which is stated as follows:
“The only question for determination in this case is whether it was necessary for the county court in approving a full-blood conveyance on the 15th day of August, 1914, to comply with the rule 10 of the ¡Supreme Court of the state of Oklahoma. If compliance with such rule is necessary, the deed of plaintiffs in error was void; if such compliance was not necéssary, then the trial court erred in entering judgment on the pleadings.”
This court, on June…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Tiger v. Western Investment Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1911
- Parker v. RichardSupreme Court of the United States · 1919
- State Ex Rel. Miller v. HuserSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1919
- The Homesteaders v. McCombs, Ins. Com'r.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1909
- Barnett v. KunkelCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1919
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by20 opinions
- Winona Oil Co. v. BarnesSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1921
- Homer v. LesterSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1923
- Sperry Oil & Gas Co. v. ChisholmSupreme Court of the United States · 1924
- In Re Thompson's Estate v. ThompsonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1937
- Lehman v. State ex rel. Wyoming Workers' Compensation DivisionWyoming Supreme Court · 1988
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.