Legal Opinion
Cates v. Miles
Supreme Court of Oklahoma
Decided December 11, 1917No. 9396PublishedCited by 16 opinions
Error from County Court, Tulsa County; H. L. Sta-ndeven, Judge. Action by N. J. Cates against W. P. Miles and others. From a judgment sustaining a demurrer to plaintiff’s second amended petition, he brings err-or.
1Opinion of the CourtKane, J.
This cause comes on to be heard upon the motion of the deféndant in error to dismiss the appeal herein, upon the grounds that this court has never obtained, and has not now, jurisdiction of this cause, or of the person of the defendant in error.
An examination of the record discloses that upon the filing of a second amended petition in the court below a demurrer was interposed thereto, and thereafter the court entered the following order:
“Tliut afterwards, to- wit, on the 24th day of February, 1917, the said demurrer coming regularly on for hearing, and the plain tiff appearing by his attorney…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Berry and Berry v. BartonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1902
- Campbell v. ThornburghSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1916
- State Ex Rel. Freeling v. MartinSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1917
3Cited by16 opinions
- Hunter v. HughesSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1920
- Brooks v. J. R. Watkins Medical Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1921
- Bank of Buchanan County v. PriestlySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1922
- Points v. Oklahoma Publishing Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1983
- Smith v. HughesSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1929
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.