Legal Opinion

Weininger v. Metropolitan Fire Insurance

Illinois Supreme Court

Decided February 21, 1935No. 22783. Decree affirmedPublishedCited by 42 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Herrick

Hyman Weininger, Oscar Weininger and Jacob Weininger, appellees, (hereinafter called the complainants,) doing business as H. Weininger & Sons, a co-partnership, filed their bill in chancery in the superior court of Cook county against the appellants (hereinafter called the defendants) to recover upon nineteen fire insurance policies, aggregating $25,000, issued to the complainants by the sixteen defendants and to apportion the loss among the defendants. The fire causing the loss was discovered in the complainants’ place of business about 9 :oo P. M. on January 18, 1932. The loss claimed in…

2Cases cited23 opinions

  1. Barton v. BarbourSupreme Court of the United States · 1881
  2. Continental Life Insurance v. RogersIllinois Supreme Court · 1887
  3. City of Chicago v. CollinsIllinois Supreme Court · 1898
  4. Arnold v. American Insurance Co.California Supreme Court · 1906
  5. North American Insurance v. YatesIllinois Supreme Court · 1905

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by42 opinions

  1. Zurich Insurance v. Raymark Industries, Inc.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1986
  2. Tarzian v. West Bend Mutual Fire InsuranceAppellate Court of Illinois · 1966
  3. Mensik v. SmithIllinois Supreme Court · 1960
  4. Harry Alter Company, an Illinois Corporation v. Chrysler Corporation, a Delaware CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1961
  5. Packard Manufacturing Co. v. Indiana Lumbermens Mutual InsuranceSupreme Court of Missouri · 1947

37 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API