Legal Opinion

McCullough v. Southwestern Bell Telephone Co.

Supreme Court of Kansas

Decided July 11, 1942No. 35,572PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Harvey, J.:

This is a workmen’s compensation case. It was presented to the compensation commissioner upon the joint petition and stipulation of the claimant and respondent. This may be summarized or quoted as follows: Claimant and respondent were operating under the workmen’s compensation act. On October 21, 1939, claimant met with personal injuries by accident arising out of and in the course of his employment when he was struck in the eye by a piece of gravel. Claimant’s injuries and disabilities are:

“(a) According to expert medical opinion as set out…

2Cases cited38 opinions

  1. Lente v. LuciSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1922
  2. Ossic v. Verde Central MinesArizona Supreme Court · 1935
  3. Cline v. Studebaker Corp.Michigan Supreme Court · 1915
  4. Strong v. Sonken-Galamba Iron & Metal Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1921
  5. Richardson v. National Refining Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1933

33 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Lambert v. Industrial CommissionIllinois Supreme Court · 1952
  2. Rogers v. Board of Public UtilitiesSupreme Court of Kansas · 1944
  3. Piper v. Kansas Turnpike AuthoritySupreme Court of Kansas · 1968
  4. Western Contracting Corp. v. Industrial CommissionUtah Supreme Court · 1964
  5. Marquiss v. Bilwil Mining Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1949

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API