Introducing ATLASLearn more
Legal Opinion

Anson v. County of Merced

California Court of Appeal

Decided July 20, 1988No. F009294PublishedCited by 23 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

BEST, J.

This is an appeal from an order of dismissal following the sustaining of a demurrer to plaintiff’s complaint without leave to amend.

Procedural and Factual Background

On May 22, 1986, plaintiff, Sharolyn Renee Anson (Anson), served a claim for damages allegedly arising out of medical negligence on the Merced County Board of Supervisors pursuant to Government Code section 900 et seq. The county rejected the claim on June 24, 1986. On December 23, 1986, as required by Code of Civil Procedure section 364, Anson served notices of intention to file suit for medical negligence on…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Fuentes v. Workers' Compensation Appeals BoardCalifornia Supreme Court · 1976
  2. Bailey v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1977
  3. Young v. HainesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1986
  4. Smith v. City and County of San FranciscoCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1977
  5. Bledstein v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1984

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by23 opinions

  1. Doe Ex Rel. Doe v. Petaluma City School DistrictDistrict Court, N.D. California · 1993
  2. Munoz v. State of CaliforniaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1995
  3. Institoris v. City of Los AngelesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1989
  4. Martell v. Antelope Valley Hospital Medical CenterCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1998
  5. Preferred Risk Mutual Insurance v. ReiswigCalifornia Supreme Court · 1999

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

View API DocsGet API Key

Powered by the Exa API