Legal Opinion

Preferred Risk Mutual Insurance v. Reiswig

California Supreme Court

Decided August 5, 1999No. S073975PublishedCited by 25 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

CHIN, J.

Code of Civil Procedure section 364, subdivision (a),1 part of the Medical Injury Compensation Reform Act (MICRA), requires plaintiffs to give defendants 90 days’ notice of intent to sue for actions “based upon” defendants’ professional negligence. Section 364, subdivision (d), tolls the “applicable statute of limitations” governing the negligence action for 90 days following proper statutory notice. We must decide whether subdivision *212(d) applies to an equitable indemnity action that is based on professional negligence, but governed by a non-MICRA statute of limitations. We…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Woods v. YoungCalifornia Supreme Court · 1991
  2. American Bank & Trust Co. v. Community HospitalCalifornia Supreme Court · 1984
  3. Hayes v. Mercy Hospital & Medical CenterIllinois Supreme Court · 1990
  4. Delaney v. BakerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1999
  5. Western Steamship Lines, Inc. v. San Pedro Peninsula HospitalCalifornia Supreme Court · 1994

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by25 opinions

  1. Fox v. Ethicon Endo-Surgery, Inc.California Supreme Court · 2005
  2. Morillion v. Royal Packing Co.California Supreme Court · 2000
  3. Chubb Custom Insurance Company v. Space Systems/ Loral, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2013
  4. Yun Hee So v. Sook Ja ShinCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2013
  5. Unruh-Haxton v. Regents of University of CaliforniaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2008

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API