Legal Opinion

Smith v. City and County of San Francisco

California Court of Appeal

Decided March 18, 1977No. Civ. 39582PublishedCited by 28 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

ELKINGTON, J.

Under California’s Tort Claims Act (Gov. Code, § 900 et seq.) a claim against a public entity must be made within 100 days of the accrual of the cause of action (Gov. Code, § 911.2). If the claim is rejected an appropriate action must be commenced “not later than six months after the date such notice [of rejection] is personally delivered or deposited in the mail.” (Gov. Code, § 945.6, subd. (a) (1); italics added.)

Plaintiff Smith’s tort claim against the City and County of San Francisco was rejected by the city, and written notice of its rejection was - deposited in the…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Moyer v. Workmen's Compensation Appeals BoardCalifornia Supreme Court · 1973
  2. People v. GilbertCalifornia Supreme Court · 1969
  3. In Re WilliamsonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1954
  4. People Ex Rel. Younger v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1976
  5. Williams v. Los Angeles Metropolitan Transit AuthorityCalifornia Supreme Court · 1968

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by28 opinions

  1. Dominguez v. City of AlhambraCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1981
  2. Martell v. Antelope Valley Hospital Medical CenterCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1998
  3. Anson v. County of MercedCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1988
  4. Highland Plastics, Inc. v. EndersAppellate Division of the Superior Court of California · 1980
  5. Santa Barbara Federation of Teachers, Local 1081 v. Santa Barbara High School DistrictCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1977

23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API