Bailey v. Superior Court
California Supreme Court
Robert D. Patterson, Jr., for Real Party in Interest.
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
BIRD, C. J.
This petition for a writ of prohibition presents a question of first impression in California: Absent a stipulation of the parties, may videotape be used to record and report the proceedings at a deposition? This court concludes that it may not.
I
Petitioner, Paul Sherod Bailey, filed a personal injury complaint against Sears, Roebuck & Company, alleging that Sears had negligently designed and constructed a “Craftsman” eight-inch radial arm saw which it sold to petitioner. This negligence was alleged to have proximately caused the severing of four fingers on petitioner’s right…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Greyhound Corp. v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1961
- Estate of McDillCalifornia Supreme Court · 1975
- In Re WilliamsonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1954
- Pratt v. Coast Trucking, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 1964
- Burke v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1969
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by127 opinions
- People v. Lance W.California Supreme Court · 1985
- People v. WoodheadCalifornia Supreme Court · 1987
- People v. OverstreetCalifornia Supreme Court · 1986
- People v. ClarkCalifornia Supreme Court · 1990
- People v. WeidertCalifornia Supreme Court · 1985
122 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.