Legal Opinion

Bailey v. Superior Court

California Supreme Court

Decided September 23, 1977No. L.A. 30746PublishedCited by 127 opinions

Robert D. Patterson, Jr., for Real Party in Interest.

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

BIRD, C. J.

This petition for a writ of prohibition presents a question of first impression in California: Absent a stipulation of the parties, may videotape be used to record and report the proceedings at a deposition? This court concludes that it may not.

I

Petitioner, Paul Sherod Bailey, filed a personal injury complaint against Sears, Roebuck & Company, alleging that Sears had negligently designed and constructed a “Craftsman” eight-inch radial arm saw which it sold to petitioner. This negligence was alleged to have proximately caused the severing of four fingers on petitioner’s right…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Greyhound Corp. v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1961
  2. Estate of McDillCalifornia Supreme Court · 1975
  3. In Re WilliamsonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1954
  4. Pratt v. Coast Trucking, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 1964
  5. Burke v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1969

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by127 opinions

  1. People v. Lance W.California Supreme Court · 1985
  2. People v. WoodheadCalifornia Supreme Court · 1987
  3. People v. OverstreetCalifornia Supreme Court · 1986
  4. People v. ClarkCalifornia Supreme Court · 1990
  5. People v. WeidertCalifornia Supreme Court · 1985

122 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API