Legal Opinion
Bonds v. Department of Rehabilitation & Correction
Ohio Court of Appeals
Decided December 3, 1996No. 96API04-516PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Lazarus, Judge.
Plaintiff-appellant, Beulah Bonds, appeals from a judgment of the Court of Claims in favor of defendant-appellee, the Ohio Department of Rehabilitation and Correction (“DRC”). We affirm for the reasons that follow.
On March 17, 1992, Walter Howard Sayre burglarized appellant’s Summit County home and raped her. Appellant alleges that her injuries were proximately caused by the negligence of DRC, which released Sayre from the Lorain Correctional Institution (“LCI”) on February 21, 1992. Appellant alleges that releasing Sayre was negligent because DRC had received and was aware of…
Also in this document: Concurrence.
2Cases cited28 opinions
- United States v. MauroSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
- Cuyler v. AdamsSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
- Mussivand v. DavidOhio Supreme Court · 1989
- Carchman v. NashSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- Fex v. MichiganSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Franklin v. ColumbusOhio Court of Appeals · 1998
- Collier v. Libations Lounge, L.L.C.Ohio Court of Appeals · 2012
- Chrisman v. Ohio Department of Rehabilitation & CorrectionOhio Court of Claims · 2003
- Tokes v. Dept. of Rehab. & Corr.Ohio Court of Claims · 2018
- In re LamontOhio Court of Appeals · 2013