Legal Opinion

Chrisman v. Ohio Department of Rehabilitation & Correction

Ohio Court of Claims

Decided August 12, 2003No. 2001-08587PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

Everett Burton, Judge.

{¶ 1} Plaintiffs Robert L. Chrisman et al. filed this action against defendant, Ohio Department of Rehabilitation and Correction (“DRC”), asserting claims for relief in wrongful death and survivorship and seeking a declaration that the substantive provisions of R.C. Chapter 2743 are unconstitutional. The issues of liability and damages were bifurcated, and the case proceeded to trial on the issue of liability.

{¶ 2} On July 19, 1996, plaintiffs’ decedent, Craig Chrisman, was killed when the bicycle he was riding was struck head-on by a motor vehicle operated by Thurman…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Menifee v. Ohio Welding Products, Inc.Ohio Supreme Court · 1984
  2. Reynolds v. StateOhio Supreme Court · 1984
  3. Wallace v. Ohio Dept. of CommerceOhio Supreme Court · 2002
  4. Littleton v. Good Samaritan Hospital & Health CenterOhio Supreme Court · 1988
  5. Swoboda v. BrownOhio Supreme Court · 1935

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Lewis v. Prosecuting Atty of Columbiana Cty, Unpublished Decision (9-5-2006)Ohio Court of Appeals · 2006

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API