Peters v. Peters
California Supreme Court
The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.
1Opinion of the CourtShaw, J.
This is an appeal by the plaintiff from an order denying his motion for a new trial. There is no appeal from the judgment.
Action for battery. The plaintiff and defendant at the time the alleged cause of action arose were, and still are, husband and wife. The wife severely wounded the husband by willfully, without just cause or excuse, shooting him in the leg with a shotgun, injuring him so severely that he was confined to his bed for more than a month and was disabled from doing his ordinary work for several months thereafter. The verdict and judgment were in favor of the defendant.
The…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- Bandfield v. BandfieldMichigan Supreme Court · 1898
- Swift v. Occidental Mining & Petroleum Co.California Supreme Court · 1903
- Abbott v. AbbottSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1877
- Peters v. PetersSupreme Court of Iowa · 1875
- Schultz v. . SchultzNew York Court of Appeals · 1882
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by60 opinions
- Cole v. RushCalifornia Supreme Court · 1955
- Wait v. PierceWisconsin Supreme Court · 1926
- Klein v. KleinCalifornia Supreme Court · 1962
- Haumschild v. Continental Casualty Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1959
- Martin v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1917
55 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.