Legal Opinion

Southern California Edison v. United States

United States Court of Federal Claims

Decided October 24, 2003No. 02-1953-CPublishedCited by 39 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION AND ORDER

LETTOW, Judge.

This contract ease arises out of the California energy crisis of 2000. It is before the Court on defendant’s motion to dismiss for failure to state a claim upon which relief can be granted, pursuant to Rule 12(b)(6) of the Rules of the United States Court of Federal Claims (“RCFC”). The plaintiff, Southern California Edison (“SCE”), is a public electric utility company engaged in the business of purchasing, transmitting, and distributing electric energy to approximately eleven million customers in central and southern California. Compl. 1113. SCE alleges that…

2Cases cited40 opinions

  1. Conley v. GibsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
  2. Scheuer v. RhodesSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
  3. Davis Ex Rel. LaShonda D. v. Monroe County Board of EducationSupreme Court of the United States · 1999
  4. Heckler v. Community Health Services of Crawford County, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1984
  5. Office of Personnel Management v. RichmondSupreme Court of the United States · 1990

35 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by39 opinions

  1. bell/heery v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2014
  2. Arakaki v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2004
  3. Boston Edison Co. v. StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2005
  4. Tennessee Valley Authority v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2004
  5. Mastrolia v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2010

34 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API