Legal Opinion

Arakaki v. United States

United States Court of Federal Claims

Decided September 1, 2004No. 03-1874 CPublishedCited by 59 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

HEWITT, Judge.

This case is before the court on defendant’s motion to dismiss for lack of subject matter jurisdiction or, in the alternative, for failure to state a claim upon which relief may be granted, pursuant to Rules 12(b)(1) and 12(b)(6) of the Rules of the United States Court of Federal Claims (RCFC).1 Because materials outside the pleadings were introduced by both parties and relied on by the court in reaching its decision, the court treats defendant’s motion to dismiss under RCFC 12(b)(6) as a motion for summary judgment under RCFC 56. RCFC 12(b) (“If, on a motion ... to…

2Cases cited83 opinions

  1. Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. McNutt v. General Motors Acceptance Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1936
  3. United States v. TestanSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
  4. Irwin v. Department of Veterans AffairsSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
  5. American Pipe & Construction Co. v. UtahSupreme Court of the United States · 1974

78 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by59 opinions

  1. DMS All-Star Joint Venture v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2010
  2. L-3 Communications EOTech, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2009
  3. Petro-Hunt, L.L.C. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2009
  4. L-3 Communications Eotech, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2008
  5. Westlands Water District v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2013

54 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API