Legal Opinion
Mastrolia v. United States
United States Court of Federal Claims
Decided February 19, 2010No. 09-462CPublishedCited by 32 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION AND ORDER ON DEFENDANT’S MOTION TO DISMISS
WHEELER, Judge.
Before the Court is Defendant’s October 2, 2009 motion to dismiss Plaintiff’s July 20, *3742009 complaint pursuant to Rules 12(b)(1) and 12(b)(6) of the Rules of the Court of Federal Claims (“RCFC”) and 28 U.S.C. § 1500. This case concerns a settlement agreement that Plaintiff Daniel Mastrolia entered into with his former employer, the United States Postal Service (“USPS”), on October 8, 2006. (CompU 15.) In the settlement, the parties agreed that the USPS would accommodate Mr. Mastrolia’s back disability by limiting the number…
2Cases cited66 opinions
- Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
- Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Harlow v. FitzgeraldSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
- Scheuer v. RhodesSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
- Steel Co. v. Citizens for a Better EnvironmentSupreme Court of the United States · 1998
61 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by32 opinions
- Bussie v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2011
- Treece v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2010
- Mata v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2014
- Klamath Irrigation District v. the United States 01-591l and 01-5910l Through 01United States Court of Federal Claims · 2013
- Environmental Safety Consultants, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2010
27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.