Legal Opinion

Beck v. Lane County

Oregon Supreme Court

Decided January 3, 1933PublishedCited by 19 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBean, J.

At the close of plaintiffs’ case the trial court granted an involuntary nonsuit on motion of defendant’s counsel, based upon the reasons, first, that the complaint fails to state a cause of action, as it fails to describe the easement; second, that it shows the easement was by and with the consent of the Willamette Pacific Railroad Company, the railroad which received the conveyance from Charles B. Morgan, and that the evidence does not support the complaint.

The complaint describes the plaintiffs’ land and also describes the right of way, which is a branch line, extending from Eugene to…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. United States Pipe Line Co. v. Delaware, Lackawanna & Western RailroadSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1898
  2. Patterson v. Chambers Power Co.Oregon Supreme Court · 1916
  3. Gulf, Colorado & Santa Fe Railway Co. v. SmithTexas Supreme Court · 1888
  4. Ruhnke v. AubertOregon Supreme Court · 1911
  5. Tone v. Tillamook CityOregon Supreme Court · 1911

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by19 opinions

  1. State Highway Commission v. DealOregon Supreme Court · 1951
  2. Tipperman v. TsiatsosOregon Supreme Court · 1998
  3. POWERS ET UX. v. Coos Bay Lumber Co.Oregon Supreme Court · 1953
  4. Rose Et Ux. v. Denn Et Ux.Oregon Supreme Court · 1949
  5. Patterson v. Horsefly Irrigation DistrictOregon Supreme Court · 1937

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API