Eriksen v. Manufacturers Distributing Co.
Washington Supreme Court
Appeal from a judgment of the superior court for King county, Jurey, J., entered March 10, 1917, upon granting a nonsuit, dismissing an action on contract, tried to the court.
1Opinion of the CourtParker, J.
— The plaintiffs, Eriksen and wife, seek recovery of damages which they allege resulted to them *160from the breach by the defendant of a lease contract. Trial in the superior court for King county resulted in judgment of dismissal and denial of recovery, upon motion made by counsel for defendant at the close of the plaintiffs’ evidence challenging the sufficiency of the evidence to warrant any recovery by the plaintiffs. From this "disposition of the cause, the plaintiffs have appealed to this court.
In April, 1914, these parties signed a contract, purporting to be a lease of certain business…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Godefroy v. HuppWashington Supreme Court · 1916
- Watkins v. BalchWashington Supreme Court · 1906
- Anderson v. Frye & BruhnWashington Supreme Court · 1912
- Backus v. FeeksWashington Supreme Court · 1913
- Forrester v. Reliable Transfer Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1910
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Central Building Co. v. Keystone Shares Corp.Washington Supreme Court · 1936
- Zinn v. KnopesWashington Supreme Court · 1920
- Leeker v. MarcotteArizona Supreme Court · 1932
- Omak Realty Investment Co. v. DeweyWashington Supreme Court · 1924
- German Mexican Co. v. Mexican Pacific Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1931
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.