Legal Opinion

Watkins v. Balch

Washington Supreme Court

Decided January 4, 1906No. 5813PublishedCited by 25 opinions

Appeal from a judgment of the superior court for Che-ha.lis county, Irwin, J., entered April 10, 1905, upon findings in favor of the plaintiff, after a trial on the merits before the court without a jury, in an action of forcible entry and detainer.

1Opinion of the CourtFullerton, J.

This is an action under the statute of forcible entry and detainer. On March 1, 1902, the respond*311ent and the appellants entered into an oral agreement whereby the respondent undertook to lease to the appellants certain farm -lands, situated in Chehalis county, for a term of five years, in consideration that the appellants would, during that time, care for a flock of goats the respondent intended purchasing and putting on the land, and would perform work and labor in clearing and improving the land to the amount in value of $1QD for each year during the term of the lease. Pursuant to this…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Morrill v. Mackman.Michigan Supreme Court · 1872
  2. Arbenz v. Exley, Watkins & Co.West Virginia Supreme Court · 1903
  3. Richards v. RedelsheimerWashington Supreme Court · 1904
  4. Coudert v. . CohnNew York Court of Appeals · 1890
  5. Dunckel v. . DunckelNew York Court of Appeals · 1894

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by25 opinions

  1. Mobley v. HarkinsWashington Supreme Court · 1942
  2. Income Properties Investment Corp. v. TrefethenWashington Supreme Court · 1930
  3. Matzger v. Arcade Building & Realty Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1914
  4. Andersonian Investment Co. v. WadeWashington Supreme Court · 1919
  5. Josephinium Associates v. KahliCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2002

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API