Williams ex rel. Williams v. Bowen
Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
CARDAMONE, Circuit Judge:
This appeal from a denial of disability benefits is somewhat uncommon because it requires us to reverse an administrative determination for lack of substantial evidence. Such a determination must demonstrate a rational connection between the agency’s legal conclusion and the medical and lay testimony presented. Only then can a reviewing court be assured that the evidence on which the administration determination rests is “substantial.” The constituents of this required foundation are wanting in this appeal brought by Joyce E. Williams on behalf of her daughter Loretta…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Richardson v. PeralesSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
- Consolidated Edison Co. v. National Labor Relations BoardSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
- Universal Camera Corp. v. National Labor Relations BoardSupreme Court of the United States · 1951
- George MONGEUR, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Margaret HECKLER, Secretary of Health and Human Services, Defendant-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1983
- Ermano Valente v. Secretary of Health and Human ServicesCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1984
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by323 opinions
- Edwind F. PRATTS, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Shirley S. CHATER, Commissioner of Social Security, Defendant-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1996
- Rosado v. SullivanDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1992
- Hackett v. BarnhartCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2005
- Williams v. BowenCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1988
- Wilson v. AstrueCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2010
318 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.