Legal Opinion

Liberty Bank & Trust Co. of Oklahoma City, N.A. v. Rogalin

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided February 6, 1996No. 83977PublishedCited by 30 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

SUMMERS, Justice.

The appeal is before us prior to briefing on the merits and solely on the issue of whether it is timely. We conclude that it is not. Because our prior dismissal was for a wrong reason we grant rehearing and withdraw our earlier order of dismissal for lack of a filed final District Court order. Now, although we are satisfied the order was indeed on file, as Appellant has insisted, it lacks the requisites of appealability. Mr. Rogalin’s appeal is premature, and the appeal must remain dismissed for that reason. For the benefit of the bench and bar we explain why this is so.

Libert…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Tolson v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1984
  2. Federal Deposit Insurance Corp. v. TidwellSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1991
  3. Lincoln Bank & Trust Co. v. Oklahoma Tax CommissionSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1992
  4. Tinker Investment & Mortgage Corp. v. City of Midwest CitySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1994
  5. Founders Bank and Trust Co. v. UpsherSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1992

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by30 opinions

  1. Martin v. JohnsonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1998
  2. LCR, INC. v. Linwood PropertiesSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1996
  3. Chandler (U.S.A.), Inc. v. TyreeSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 2004
  4. Oklahoma City Urban Renewal Authority v. City of Oklahoma CitySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 2005
  5. Berryhill v. RhodesSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 2014

25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API