Legal Opinion
Oklahoma City Urban Renewal Authority v. City of Oklahoma City
Supreme Court of Oklahoma
Decided March 28, 2005No. 100,413, 100,538PublishedCited by 37 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtKauger, J.
¶ 1 We retained this cause to address whether the trial court erred in advancing several orders for appeal pursuant 12 O.S. 2001 § 994 1 in a multi-claim/multi-party cause. We hold that because the orders appealed from either left issues pending on advanced claims or were so interrelated and intertwined with the pending claims, the trial court prematurely advanced the orders. 2
PROCEDURAL HISTORY AND FACTS
¶2 This cause concerns another of the challenges to the development of an area in Oklahoma City, Oklahoma, known as Brick-town, brought by Moshe Tal (Tal) 3 and a group of Oklahoma City…
2Cases cited37 opinions
- Curtiss-Wright Corp. v. General Electric Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1980
- Sears, Roebuck & Co. v. MacKeySupreme Court of the United States · 1956
- Professor Harriet Spiegel v. The Trustees of Tufts CollegeCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1988
- Smith v. Local 819 I.B.T. Pension PlanCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2002
- Hadnot v. ShawSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1992
32 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by37 opinions
- Tal v. HoganCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2006
- Powers v. DISTRICT COURT OF TULSA COUNTYSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 2009
- Oklahoma Education Ass'n v. State Ex Rel. Oklahoma LegislatureSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 2007
- Tulsa Industrial Authority v. City of TulsaSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 2011
- Cerny v. Todco Barricade Co.Nebraska Supreme Court · 2007
32 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.