Introducing ATLASLearn more
Legal Opinion · Dissent

Ultra Resources, Inc. v. Hartman

Wyoming Supreme Court

Decided March 23, 2010No. S-08-0258, S-08-0259, S-08-0260, S-08-0261, S-08-0262, S-08-0263, S-08-0264Published

1DissentVoigt, Chief Justice

[¶ 171] I respectfully dissent on what I believe to be the two main issues: whether the NPI continues to exist and, if so, whether the plaintiffs have shown that they own it.

Continued Existence of the NPI

[¶ 172] The answer to the question of whether the unit NPI survived termination of the Pinedale Unit must be found within the Unit NPI Contract. Stated in its simplest terms, the district court's conclusion was that, although commitment of the Exhibit A leases to the Pinedale Unit was a condition precedent to the obligation to pay the unit NPI, the obligation to pay the NPI was not…

2Cases cited26 opinions

  1. Camara v. AgsaludHawaii Supreme Court · 1984
  2. Doctors' Co. v. Insurance Corp. of AmericaWyoming Supreme Court · 1993
  3. MULLINNIX LLC v. HKB Royalty TrustWyoming Supreme Court · 2006
  4. Amoco Production Co. v. EM Nominee Partnership Co.Wyoming Supreme Court · 2000
  5. Wolter v. Equitable Resources Energy Co.Wyoming Supreme Court · 1999

21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

View API DocsGet API Key

Powered by the Exa API