Legal Opinion
Cox v. Secretary of Labor
District Court, District of Columbia
Decided June 14, 1990No. Civ. A. 90-0340-GHRPublishedCited by 97 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER
REVERCOMB, District Judge.
The plaintiff’s claim, in its entirety, states:
On several occasions a written complaint alleging that my previous employ er (i.e. Archer Daniels Midland Milling Co.) is in violation of law in their management of the pension and welfare plan, as the authority holds that:
“[T]he Secretary [of Labor] shall investigate the complaint and ... bring civil action in any district court ... ”;
and thereby with the omission(s) of an employee of the United States government, not exercising due care, in the execution of a statute or regulation, has and continues to deny of at…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Vaca v. SipesSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
- United States v. TestanSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- United States v. MitchellSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
- Dunlop v. BachowskiSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
- Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation v. Citizens Bank & Trust Company of Park Ridge, IllinoisCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1979
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by97 opinions
- Coulibaly v. KerryDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2016
- Wightman-Cervantes v. MuellerDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2010
- Johnson v. Veterans Affairs Medical CenterDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2015
- Bond v. U.S. Department of JusticeDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2011
- Hall v. Administrative Office of the United States CourtsDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2007
92 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.