Legal Opinion

Village of Montpelier v. Greeno

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided July 30, 1986No. 86-118PublishedCited by 81 opinions

1Per curiam

The question raised is whether, by pleading guilty, a defendant waives the right to appeal his conviction on the ground that trial was not commenced within the time required under the Ohio Speedy Trial Act. (R.C. 2945.71 et seq.)

The general view is that where an accused enters a plea of guilty he waives his right to raise the denial of his right to a speedy trial on appeal. *171Annotation (1958), 57 A.L.R. 2d 302, 343. In Partsch v. Haskins (1963), 175 Ohio St. 139, 141 [23 O.O.2d 419], we observed, in relevant part, that “even assuming petitioner had made a demand for a speedy trial, when he…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Barker v. WingoSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  2. Menna v. New YorkSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
  3. United States v. MacDonaldSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
  4. United States v. John Christopher DoyleCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1965
  5. State v. WilsonOhio Supreme Court · 1979

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by81 opinions

  1. State v. KelleyOhio Supreme Court · 1991
  2. State v. KingOhio Supreme Court · 1994
  3. Anderson v. StateMississippi Supreme Court · 1991
  4. State v. BarnettOhio Court of Appeals · 1991
  5. State v. EngleOhio Supreme Court · 1996

76 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API