State v. Barnett
Ohio Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
Grady, Judge.
Defendant-Appellant Charles T. Barnett appeals his conviction for the offense of aggravated robbery, alleging that he was deprived of his Sixth Amendment right to effective assistance of counsel and that the trial court erred in denying his motion to withdraw his plea of guilty. Appellee, state of Ohio, has failed to file a brief. For reasons discussed below, defendant-appellant’s first assignment of error will be overruled and the second assignment of error sustained.
I
Facts
On December 29, 1986, defendant-appellant Barnett was arrested on a warrant issued by Dayton Municipal…
Also in this document: Concurrence.
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- United States v. BroceSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
- Menna v. New YorkSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
- State v. SmithOhio Supreme Court · 1977
- State v. LytleOhio Supreme Court · 1976
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by122 opinions
- State v. BrimacombeOhio Court of Appeals · 2011
- State v. Dunbar, 87317 (6-28-2007)Ohio Court of Appeals · 2007
- State v. MilczewskiOhio Court of Appeals · 2012
- State v. LaneOhio Court of Appeals · 2010
- State v. RosemarkOhio Court of Appeals · 1996
117 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.