State v. Kelley
Ohio Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtHolmes, J.
The central issue presented in this case is whether ap-pellee knowingly, intelligently, and voluntarily waived his constitutional rights when he entered his plea of guilty to the offense of voluntary manslaughter. For the reasons which follow, we answer this query in the affirmative.
When a trial court or appellate court is reviewing a plea submitted by a defendant, its focus should be on whether the dictates of Crim. R. 11 have been followed. Crim. R. 11 provides in pertinent part:
“C. Pleas of guilty and no contest in felony cases.
* *
“(2) In felony cases the court may refuse to accept a plea…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Boykin v. AlabamaSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
- State v. NeroOhio Supreme Court · 1990
- Village of Montpelier v. GreenoOhio Supreme Court · 1986
- State v. BranchOhio Court of Appeals · 1983
3Cited by285 opinions
- State v. EngleOhio Supreme Court · 1996
- State v. KettererOhio Supreme Court · 2006
- State v. SpatesOhio Supreme Court · 1992
- State v. KingOhio Supreme Court · 1994
- State v. FitzpatrickOhio Supreme Court · 2004
280 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.